The Concept of Respect Among the main questions about respect that philosophers have addressed are these: Philosophers have variously identified it as a mode of behavior, a form of treatment, a kind of valuing, a type of attention, a motive, an attitude, a feeling, a tribute, a principle, a duty, an entitlement, a moral virtue, an epistemic virtue: Can an object come to deserve less or no respect? What, if anything, does it add to morality over and above the conduct, attitudes, and character traits required or encouraged by various moral principles or virtues?
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your The ethical respect of nature and educational issues.
The first concept being the good, or well-being, of a living thing. This concept entails doing what is necessary for the welfare of nature. An example of this would be to capture several endangered animals in order to breed them in a controlled environment.
While the animals that are captured may be miserable while being held in captivity, it will ensure the species fate and also aide in keeping control and stability in Mother Nature for many years to come.
The second concept is the idea of an entity possessing inherent worth. An example of this would be to realize that a bird, no matter how small or large, aides in keeping the bug or rodent population under control, preventing massive swarms or the spread of a potentially deadly disease.
With this we would realize all animals or aspects of nature are looked at as an important and necessary part of the over all balance required to maintain the world we have come to know today. The idea of a biosphere is quite possibly the most ideal environment to test out the principles that Taylor brings to light.
If one were to study a biosphere they would see that in order for the process to work out as planned, they would have to treat the environment within the biosphere with the utmost of care. If the occupants of the biosphere were to treat the inside environment the same way the mass majority treat the outside environment then the biosphere would fail for sure.
With this being said, if the occupants were to rely on and adhere to the principles being pointed out by Taylor, then the problem would be fixed and the biosphere would inadvertently be a success.
If the occupants were to adhere, they would in fact be protecting nature within the biosphere. The anthropocentric view states that humans are the center of the universe. In my opinion, there is nothing farther from the truth when you say we are the center, or most important thing, of the universe.
If you actually look at us we are nothing more than a disease, not much different than any other ordinary one.
Every day land is destroyed and animals lose their homes so that we, the human race, can simply live in comfort. Every day we are multiplying, and every year the birth rate is increasing as we grow in numbers. Is this not the same thing that the common cold or any other type of disease does?
You can even compare our attempts at space exploration to a disease in the beginning stages of going airborne and trying to spread itself to another host, or planet in this instance.
The anthropocentric view, when widely supported, can cause problems with the principles that Taylor has brought to our attention. It also points out the importance in taking care of it and respecting it, instead of ignoring and neglecting it.
If one believes that they are the center of the universe, they would also believe they are more important than anything else in it. Without tress around to convert carbon dioxide to oxygen we would be unable to breathe. Without animals for meat we would eventually be deprived of a balanced diet and would not be able to fight off disease as effectively.
Without nature providing us with what we need, just like it does for every other animal species on this planet, we would just be another number on the long list of extinctions. More essays like this:best known for his book Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics (), which promulgated the biocentric viewpoint in environmental ethics and was a foundational work of environmental philosophy.
The Nature of Respect, and Respect for Nature. An extremely influential ethical framework considers human beings as the only proper subjects of direct moral consideration. Indeed, moral considerability has generally been rooted in rationality, and the corollary ability of rational persons to fix their own ends.
Jan 01, · Respect for Nature has 43 ratings and 4 reviews.
Megan said: This is a classic in environmental ethics; Taylor's presentation is methodical and clear, an /5. In this paper, will be conducting an analysis of the article “The Ethics of Respect for nature” written by Paul W.
Taylor. In this paper Taylor presented the foundational structure for a life-centered theory of environmental ethics. Respect for Nature has 42 ratings and 4 reviews. Megan said: This is a classic in environmental ethics; Taylor's presentation is methodical and clear, an /5.
The ethics of respect for nature is made up of three basic elements: a belief system. then there remains the task of indicating why scientifically informed and rational thinkers with a developed capacity of reality awareness can find it acceptable as a way of conceiving of the natural world and our place in it.